Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2001 93(13):1008-1013; doi:10.1093/jnci/93.13.1008
© 2001 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, C. I.
Right arrow Articles by Daling, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, C. I.
Right arrow Articles by Daling, J. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 93, No. 13, 1008-1013, July 4, 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press


REPORT

Tamoxifen Therapy for Primary Breast Cancer and Risk of Contralateral Breast Cancer

Christopher I. Li, Kathleen E. Malone, Noel S. Weiss, Janet R. Daling

Affiliation of authors: Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.

Correspondence to: Christopher I. Li, M.D., M.P.H., Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave., North, MP 381, P.O. Box 19024, Seattle, WA 98109–1024 (e-mail: cili{at}fhcrc.org).

Background: Women diagnosed with breast cancer have a twofold to sixfold greater risk of developing contralateral breast cancer than women in the general population have of developing a first breast cancer. Tamoxifen therapy reduces this risk, but it is unclear if this benefit exists for both estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative contralateral tumors. Methods: Using data from a population-based tumor registry that collects information on the ER status of breast tumors, we followed 8981 women residing in western Washington State who were diagnosed with a primary unilateral invasive breast cancer during the period from 1990 through 1998 to identify cases of contralateral breast cancer. We restricted our analyses to women who were at least 50 years old and whose first breast cancer had a localized or regional stage; women who received adjuvant hormonal therapy but not chemotherapy (n = 4654) were classified as tamoxifen users, while those who received neither adjuvant hormonal therapy nor chemotherapy (n = 4327) were classified as nonusers of tamoxifen. By reviewing selected patient abstracts, we estimated that 94% of the subjects were classified correctly with respect to tamoxifen use. The risk of contralateral breast cancer associated with tamoxifen use was estimated with the use of Cox regression. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Of the 89 tamoxifen users and 100 nonusers of tamoxifen diagnosed with contralateral breast cancer, 112 had ER-positive tumors, 20 had ER-negative tumors, and 57 had tumors with an ER status that was unknown or had not been determined by an immunohistochemical assay. The risk of developing an ER-positive and an ER-negative contralateral tumor among tamoxifen users was 0.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.5 to 1.1) and 4.9 (95% CI = 1.4 to 17.4), respectively, times that of nonusers of tamoxifen. This difference in risk by ER status was statistically significant (P<.0001). Conclusions: Tamoxifen use appears to decrease the risk of ER-positive contralateral breast tumors, but it appears to increase the risk of ER-negative contralateral tumors.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
L. Bertelsen, L. Bernstein, J. H. Olsen, L. Mellemkjaer, R. W. Haile, C. F. Lynch, K. E. Malone, H. Anton-Culver, J. Christensen, B. Langholz, et al.
Effect of Systemic Adjuvant Treatment on Risk for Contralateral Breast Cancer in the Women's Environment, Cancer and Radiation Epidemiology Study
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 2, 2008; 100(1): 32 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. Hemminki, J. Ji, and A. Forsti
Risks for Familial and Contralateral Breast Cancer Interact Multiplicatively and Cause a High Risk
Cancer Res., February 1, 2007; 67(3): 868 - 870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
G. Arpino, H.L. Weiss, G.M. Clark, S.G. Hilsenbeck, and C.K. Osborne
Hormone Receptor Status of a Contralateral Breast Cancer Is Independent of the Receptor Status of the First Primary in Patients Not Receiving Adjuvant Tamoxifen
J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2005; 23(21): 4687 - 4694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
E. Ziv, J. Tice, R. Smith-Bindman, J. Shepherd, S. Cummings, and K. Kerlikowske
Mammographic Density and Estrogen Receptor Status of Breast Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2004; 13(12): 2090 - 2095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr Cancer TherHome page
B. P. Jacobs, B. Burns, R. Marya, J. Chapman, B. Stone, S. Hwang, M. Goldman, K. Barrows, D. Hamolsky, and K. Sampel
Integrative Tumor Board: Recurrent Breast Cancer or New Primary?
Integr Cancer Ther, September 1, 2003; 2(3): 289 - 300.
[PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
G. Pichert, B. Bolliger, K. Buser, and O. Pagani
Evidence-based management options for women at increased breast/ovarian cancer risk
Ann. Onc., January 1, 2003; 14(1): 9 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
T. Bachleitner-Hofmann, B. Pichler-Gebhard, M. Rudas, M. Gnant, S. Taucher, D. Kandioler, E. Janschek, P. Dubsky, S. Roka, E. Sporn, et al.
Pattern of Hormone Receptor Status of Secondary Contralateral Breast Cancers in Patients Receiving Adjuvant Tamoxifen
Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2002; 8(11): 3427 - 3432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. T. Chlebowski, N. Col, E. P. Winer, D. E. Collyar, S. R. Cummings, V. G. Vogel III, H. J. Burstein, A. Eisen, I. Lipkus, and D. G. Pfister
American Society of Clinical Oncology Technology Assessment of Pharmacologic Interventions for Breast Cancer Risk Reduction Including Tamoxifen, Raloxifene, and Aromatase Inhibition
J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2002; 20(15): 3328 - 3343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
V. G. Vogel
Why Do We Still Use Hormone Replacement Therapy? Why Don't We Use It More?
J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2002; 20(3): 616 - 619.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. M. Lippman and W. Ki Hong
Cancer Prevention by Delay : Commentary re: J. A. O'Shaughnessy et al., Treatment and Prevention of Intraepithelial Neoplasia: An Important Target for Accelerated New Agent Development. Clin. Cancer Res., 8: 314-346, 2002.
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2002; 8(2): 305 - 313.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
C. I. Li, K. E. Malone, N. S. Weiss, and J. R. Daling
Re: Tamoxifen and Contralateral Breast Cancer: the Other Side
J Natl Cancer Inst, November 21, 2001; 93(22): 1753 - 1753.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
S. M. Swain
RESPONSE: Re: Tamoxifen and Contralateral Breast Cancer: the Other Side
J Natl Cancer Inst, November 21, 2001; 93(22): 1753 - 1754.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
C. W. Lee, L. Weir, and K. A. Gelmon
Effect of News Media Coverage of Cancer Risk on Clinical Oncology Practice
J Natl Cancer Inst, November 7, 2001; 93(21): 1656 - 1657.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
S. M. Swain
Tamoxifen and Contralateral Breast Cancer: the Other Side
J Natl Cancer Inst, July 4, 2001; 93(13): 963 - 965.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.