© 2000 by Oxford University Press
Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 92, No. 18, 1534-1535,
September 20, 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press
CORRESPONDENCE |
Re: New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors [Ovarian Cancer]
Affiliations of authors: I. Vergote, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium; G. J. Rustin, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, U.K.; E. A. Eisenhauer, National Cancer Institute of Canada, Kingston, Canada; G. B. Kristensen, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; E. Pujade-Lauraine, Hospital Hotel Dieu, Paris, France; M. K. Parmar, Medical Research Council, London, U.K.; M. Friedlander, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia; A. Jakobsen, Velje Hospital, Velje, Denmark; J. B. Vermorken, University Hospital Antwerp, Belgium.
Correspondence to: Ignace Vergote, M.D., Ph.D., University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
We read with much interest the article by Therasse et al. (1) on the new Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Group (RECIST) in the Journal. In the RECIST, the definition of progression is based on the evaluation of measurable and nonmeasurable disease. However, it is our experience that, in many randomized trials of the first-line treatment of ovarian cancer, in which progression-free survival is often the primary end point, investigators start second-line treatment based on an increase in serum CA 125 levels only, without clinical evidence of progression. This practice has led to confusion in establishing the date of progression, since such cases, in which treatment is initiated before objective progression has been documented, are handled in variable ways by different groups. Some groups count these patients as having progressive disease, others censor them, and others ignore treatment before disease progression altogether.
In an effort to address this issue in a consistent manner, a working group of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup has developed definitions of CA 125 progression to complement the definitions of objective disease progression for use in first-line chemotherapy trials in ovarian cancer. The definitions of CA 125 progression are based on the well-known and validated definitions of progression in ovarian cancer using serum CA 125 levels (2). The published data support the concept that, after first-line therapy, doubling in CA 125 from the upper limit of normal reliably predicts objective progression (lead time varies from 0 to 12 months; median, 63 days). For those patients whose CA 125 never fell to the normal range, a doubling from the nadir has been shown to predict progression among such patients treated at the Mount Vernon Hospital with a false-positive rate of <2% (Rustin G: personal communication).
The proposed definitions of progression in Table 1
consider three patient groups, according to their serum CA 125 behavior during first-line therapy. A patient may be declared to have progressive disease on the basis of either the objective RECIST criteria or the CA 125 criteria. The date of progression will be the date of the earlier of the two events if both are documented. Since it was recognized that the timing of investigations during first-line therapy and subsequent follow-up may also influence the date of progression-free survival in clinical trials, we propose that serum CA 125 levels be obtained on day 1 of each chemotherapy cycle, 4 weeks after the last course, thereafter every 3–4 months for the first 36 months, every 6 months from month 37–60, and every year from 5 years after the primary diagnosis.
|
It should be emphasized that these definitions of progression are intended for the specific context of first-line therapy studies. We acknowledge that further work is needed to reach a consensus on the place of CA 125 in defining response and progression in the circumstance of phase II trials of new drugs in relapsed ovarian cancer, which is the primary setting for which the RECIST criteria were developed.
NOTES
The GCIG (Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup) has representatives of the EORTC–GCCG (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer–Gynaecological Cancer Cooperative Group), MRC (Medical Research Council), NCIC CTG (National Cancer Institute Canada Clinical Trials Group), NSGO (Nordic Society of Gynaecologic Oncology), AGO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie), NCI–US (National Cancer Institute United States), GINECO (Group d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens), GOG (Gynecologic Oncology Group), COSA (Clinical Oncology Society of Australia), RTOG (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group), SGCSG (Scottish Gynaecological Cancer Study Group) and the SWOG (South-West Oncology Group).
RREFERENCES
1
Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:205–16.
2
Rustin GJ, Nelstrop AE, Tuxen MK, Lambert HE. Defining progression of ovarian carcinoma during follow-up according to CA 125: a North Thames Ovary Group Study. Ann Oncol 1996;7:361–4.
Correspondence about this Article
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
J Natl Cancer Inst 2004 96: 487-488.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. L. Scurr, A. D. Guminski, Y.-E. Chiew, R. L. Balleine, R. Sharma, Y. Lei, K. Pryor, G. V. Wain, A. Brand, K. Byth, et al. Ankyrin Repeat Domain 1, ANKRD1, a Novel Determinant of Cisplatin Sensitivity Expressed in Ovarian Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2008; 14(21): 6924 - 6932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Prat, M. Parera, B. Adamo, S. Peralta, M. A. Perez-Benavente, A. Garcia, A. Gil-Moreno, J. M. Martinez-Palones, J. Baselga, and J. M. del Campo Risk of recurrence during follow-up for optimally treated advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) with a low-level increase of serum CA-125 levels Ann. Onc., September 26, 2008; (2008) mdn601v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. E. Johnatty, J. Beesley, J. Paul, S. Fereday, A. B. Spurdle, P. M. Webb, K. Byth, S. Marsh, H. McLeod, AOCS Study Group, et al. ABCB1 (MDR 1) Polymorphisms and Progression-Free Survival among Women with Ovarian Cancer following Paclitaxel/Carboplatin Chemotherapy Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2008; 14(17): 5594 - 5601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. K. Tummala and W. P. McGuire Ovarian Cancer, CA-125 Addiction, and Informed Confusion: Much Ado About Less J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2007; 25(24): 3570 - 3571. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.-Y. Liu, D. S. Alberts, B. J. Monk, M. Brady, J. Moon, and M. Markman An Early Signal of CA-125 Progression for Ovarian Cancer Patients Receiving Maintenance Treatment After Complete Clinical Response to Primary Therapy J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2007; 25(24): 3615 - 3620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J-M Ferrero, B Weber, J-F Geay, D Lepille, H Orfeuvre, M Combe, F Mayer, B Leduc, H Bourgeois, D Paraiso, et al. Second-line chemotherapy with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin is highly effective in patients with advanced ovarian cancer in late relapse: a GINECO phase II trial Ann. Onc., February 1, 2007; 18(2): 263 - 268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. L. Coleman, A. Gordon, J. Barter, S. Sun, W. Rackoff, and T. J. Herzog Early Changes in CA125 After Treatment with Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin or Topotecan Do Not Always Reflect Best Response in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer Patients Oncologist, January 1, 2007; 12(1): 72 - 78. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. J.S. Rustin, P. Timmers, A. Nelstrop, G. Shreeves, S. M. Bentzen, B. Baron, M. J. Piccart, K. Bertelsen, G. Stuart, J. Cassidy, et al. Comparison of CA-125 and Standard Definitions of Progression of Ovarian Cancer in the Intergroup Trial of Cisplatin and Paclitaxel Versus Cisplatin and Cyclophosphamide J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2006; 24(1): 45 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. P. Delord, C. Allal, M. Canal, E. Mery, P. Rochaix, I. Hennebelle, A. Pradines, E. Chatelut, R. Bugat, S. Guichard, et al. Selective inhibition of HER2 inhibits AKT signal transduction and prolongs disease-free survival in a micrometastasis model of ovarian carcinoma Ann. Onc., December 1, 2005; 16(12): 1889 - 1897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Tanaka, S. Miyamoto, S. O. Suzuki, E. Oki, H. Yagi, K. Sonoda, A. Yamazaki, H. Mizushima, Y. Maehara, E. Mekada, et al. Clinical Significance of Heparin-Binding Epidermal Growth Factor-Like Growth Factor and A Disintegrin and Metalloprotease 17 Expression in Human Ovarian Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2005; 11(13): 4783 - 4792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Crawford and J. Peace Does the nadir CA125 concentration predict a long-term outcome after chemotherapy for carcinoma of the ovary? Ann. Onc., January 1, 2005; 16(1): 47 - 50. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. J.S. Rustin Can We Now Agree to Use the Same Definition to Measure Response According to CA-125? J. Clin. Oncol., October 15, 2004; 22(20): 4035 - 4036. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. J. S. Rustin, R. C. Bast Jr., G. J. Kelloff, J. C. Barrett, S. K. Carter, P. D. Nisen, C. C. Sigman, D. R. Parkinson, and R. W. Ruddon Use of CA-125 in Clinical Trial Evaluation of New Therapeutic Drugs for Ovarian Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2004; 10(11): 3919 - 3926. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. J. S. Rustin, M. Quinn, T. Thigpen, A. du Bois, E. Pujade-Lauraine, A. Jakobsen, E. Eisenhauer, S. Sagae, K. Greven, I. Vergote, et al. Re: New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors (Ovarian Cancer) J Natl Cancer Inst, March 17, 2004; 96(6): 487 - 488. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. J.S. Rustin Use of CA-125 to Assess Response to New Agents in Ovarian Cancer Trials J. Clin. Oncol., May 15, 2003; 21(90100): 187s - 193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.E. Guppy and G.J.S. Rustin CA125 Response: Can it Replace the Traditional Response Criteria in Ovarian Cancer? Oncologist, October 1, 2002; 7(5): 437 - 443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. S. Dizon, M. L. Hensley, E. A. Poynor, P. Sabbatini, C. Aghajanian, A. Hummer, E. Venkatraman, and D. R. Spriggs Retrospective Analysis of Carboplatin and Paclitaxel as Initial Second-Line Therapy for Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma: Application Toward a Dynamic Disease State Model of Ovarian Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2002; 20(5): 1238 - 1247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. J.S. Rustin, M. Marples, A. E. Nelstrop, M. Mahmoudi, and T. Meyer Use of CA-125 to Define Progression of Ovarian Cancer in Patients With Persistently Elevated Levels J. Clin. Oncol., October 15, 2001; 19(20): 4054 - 4057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||